Fetal DNA Testing May Avert Treatment for Blood Disorder
Using high throughput RHD genotyping of fetuses may obviate the need for anti-RhD immunoglobulin in RhD-negative pregnant women, according to research published April 3 in BMJ Online First.
FRIDAY, April 4 (HealthDay News) -- Using high throughput RHD genotyping of fetuses may obviate the need for anti-RhD immunoglobulin in RhD-negative pregnant women, according to research published April 3 in BMJ Online First.
Kirstin Finning, and colleagues at NHS Blood and Transplant in Bristol, U.K., took blood samples from 1,997 RhD-negative pregnant women on or before 28 weeks' gestation. They established the accuracy of detecting fetal RHD genotyping using fetal DNA in maternal plasma by comparing it with the RhD phenotype determined serologically using cord blood.
Out of the 1,869 cord blood samples, in 1,788 cases (95.7 percent), genotyping was accurately predicted using fetal DNA in maternal plasma. In 64 cases (3.4 percent), results were either inconclusive or unobtainable, 14 samples (0.8 percent) yielded a false positive result and three (0.2 percent) yielded a false negative result.
"If these results had been applied as a guide to treatment, only 2 percent of the women would have received anti-RhD unnecessarily, compared to 38 percent without the genotyping," the authors write. "Clearly there could be benefits from taking maternal blood samples for fetal RHD genotyping at earlier stages of the pregnancy than 28 weeks' gestation to coincide with existing planned antenatal visits," they add.
Copyright © 2008 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Major congenital malformations not linked to first trimester tetracycline use
November 22nd 2024A large population-based study found that first-trimester tetracycline exposure does not elevate the risk of major congenital malformations, though specific risks for nervous system and eye anomalies warrant further research.
